|
|
Lecture 1 support page Quick page links: < back
We began the first lecture with the
macro view
We touched on the 4 business concepts and
why
We now appreciate why marketing is an
art, not a science, based on risk factors such as uncontrollable
variables; the reliability,
validity, and bias contained
Next week, we'll complete our macro
view by getting into the psyche
of the consumer.
You'll be introduced to the Rule of 3s,
Hierarchy of Effects, and come to better appreciate
If you don't recall anything more than the
following from this past Saturday, you're right
where
If marketing is a process that
results in a plan, that plan is less risky if it's developed If that's the process, what guides the marketer's efforts?
We can do what we think is best (production, product, of
selling concepts),
To define and refine this group of people
and resources needed to satisfy them,
That's the plan! And that's where we left off after Lecture 1. Reviews of important marketing research slides, and why marketing plans fail. Resources for curious currentologists (help with Qs 1-4)
U.S. Census Fact Finder (where marketers go after geographic and
demographic categories 2009 Statistical Abstract of the U.S. (The National Data Book is now on-line) Current U.S. Population clock (watch the world grow right before your eyes)
Type the name of your organization (or similar brand name competitor); then click "find profile."
Want a really good desk shelf marketing reference
text
that doesn't cost a lot.
For only a few dollars, pick up an older edition of Basic Marketing or Principles
of Marketing
Great bedside table/bathroom
reading: List of book summaries (easy fast reading of just the good stuff):
Seth Godin's The Dip
is a short 80--page book that teaches you when to quit...
All 3 of Malcolm
Gladwell's recent successes help marketers appreciate the
"fickleness" of consumers: why they behave as they do. Check out The
Tipping Point, Blink, and Outliers. In Martin Lindstom's Buyology: Truth and Lies About Why We Buy, a neuroscientist teamed with a market researcher to scan the brainwaves of subjects watching commercials.
Read why warning labels on cigarettes don't work, traditional ads no
longer create lasting impressions, and surprise! Subliminal advertising
can be highly effective.
More
quick links to other stuff that's not on this page:
Tips on
PowerPoint ,
punctuation, and
formatting layouts
More about Steve's
upcoming book
Stop Boring
Us!
Put me on the list for
future PowerPoint Master Classes
^
top
| question?
Note: The following was written in
response to a former student's
How many institutions in the Texas
Medical Center
are marketing-oriented?
Marketing activities do
not
Yes, marketing is everything but making
the product.
And all organizations engage in marketing
activities, such as buying, selling, financing, customer service,
transportation, sponsoring charity events—and more.
But when defining
how they go about their day-to-day business activities, we need to look closely at
the overall plan, and whether they're actually based on the marketing
concept.
In response to Levitt's comment about
marketing being a "stepchild" in most organizations (from
Marketing Myopia), several
project submissions for Q13 attempted to justify a specific healthcare employer
as being a marketing-oriented institution, but fell
short of meeting 3 important criteria:
What the organization does, or provides,
must have been defined by outside research that identifies a
group of potential customers with the same unmet needs. The
organization should define this group (through research), and focus
its energies on satisfying those needs.
In performing this, the organization
acquires the necessary resources to satisfy those needs,
the physical resources (buildings, beds, supplies) and human
resources (experts and staff with the knowledge and capability to
fulfill these needs).
After subtracting all costs associated
with delivering the final package of utilities to the end user, the
organization charges a price that delivers a profit that
meets its goals and objectives.
In some instances, patients may not know
what they want or need,
or the organization has to bow to the wishes and demands of inside
policymakers (doctor groups) and outside service providers (insurance
companies/HMOs), or quickly adapt to meet the changing marketing conditions
depending on what competitors offer.
In those instances, it invariably means the healthcare organization
tends to
favor one or more of the other 3 business concepts.
Production: revenue-sensitive hospitals or
small hospice care providers dependent upon donations or tax
subsidies may have to stretch
operating revenue by modifying, reducing,
Product: Technology/research
institutions that promote themselves as the best or leader;
Selling: Some community hospitals or
regional hospice care providers take unique positions
All 3 involve marketing activities, but
none is marketing-oriented.
Without exception, all healthcare
providers engage in marketing activities in one way or another.
But to truly
justify
that an organization
is marketing-oriented, we must evaluate the overall
plan Where did Gen X and Gen Y originate?
Generation X
(It's possible that) the term was coined as a result
of a 1964 study of British youth by Jane Deverson. Because it was a
new phenomenon. Deverson, in an attempt to save her research, worked
with Hollywood correspondent Charles Hamblett to create a book about
the study. In 1976, the phrase was picked up as the name of a punk rock band featuring Billy Idol. The term Generation X was later popularized in 1991 when Douglas Coupland's popular novel Generation X: Tales for an Accelerated Culture was published.
Coupland referred to those born from 1958 to 1966 in Canada,
Generation Y: Generation Y is generally considered to be the last generation of people wholly born in the 20th century (immediately after Generation X, those born from the late '70s through the '90s). As generations are defined not by formal process, but rather by demographers, the press and media, popular culture, market researchers, and by members of the generation themselves, there is no precise consensus as to which birth years constitute Generation Y. The debate is in part due to the lack of a single marquee event or events, analogous to the end of World War II for the Baby Boomer generation, that can demarcate the start or end of this generation. |
||||||
|
Copyright 2009 |
Steve Toms |
|||||||